So instead of looking like THIS:
She looked like This:
Even though the costumer got it right for everyone else, they just HAD to make poor Jane stick out like a sore thumb. I guess they wanted her to look like Keira Knightley in Pride and Prejudice who seemed to spend the entire movie stomping around in an old bathrobe and a gauze stick-dress with no chemise:
What is UP with that???
At the ball Jane looked like THIS: Notice how in the background the other guests are dressed in the same era clothing which is obviously NOT the era Jane is dressed from!
And sitting on the Front Porch we have THIS:
There's Jane, schlumped in the background with hideous posture and no corset. She should be looking like THIS on an outing such as a family picnic or to watch the fellas play cricket:
But instead, she seems to be wearing the 1795 version of the string bikini:
Spaghetti Straps and a white cotton undershirt???
Don't even get me started on the hair.
Jane Austen was born in 1775 and died at 47 years of age in 1817. She would have been wearing her hair like this, for the most part, as well as dressed like this: But instead, at the end of the movie, they had Anne Hathaway's Jane wearing THIS EXACT HAIRDO:
So I hated the movie.
2 comments:
The good news is: you hated it for FREE! (And now we won't have to rent it)
We watched "Elizabeth: The Golden Age" last night. Visually gorgeous!!! And I wanted to feel all the clothing, and inspect all the insides. Yummy. Except the suit of armour.......
Queen Q
Oh I absolutely LOVE Queen Q's comment!! You hated it for FREE! Too funny.
I'm suggesting to FOX, PARAMOUNT and all of the other movie mongrels that they come to you for period fashion advice. YOU will set them straight. And you'll possibly become famous and since I had the idea, I'll become famous too.. by default.
Post a Comment